Speedy trial law michigan

Couple is out celebrating an anniversary. Husband may have accidentally hit wife with the family Lincoln. Kuriger , Ohio App. This was never revoked. In prosecution finally went forward. Trial court erroneously dismissed the case on speedy trial grounds. Time was tolled for purposes of statutory speedy trial rights and the period of delay was not unreasonable for purposes of the constitutional right to a speedy trial.

Kerby , Ohio App. The waiver colloquy with the defendant confused tolling based on the continuance with a general waiver. Ultimately the trial was set well beyond the day limit, with no explanation for further continuances. Because the exchange is construed as amounting to a general waiver of the right to speedy trial, counsel was not ineffective for failure to press for discharge on speedy trial grounds.

Boles , Montgomery App. A defendant can not waive his right to a speedy trial on charges that have not yet been brought. Though the defendant only pled no contest to two charges initially filed the error was not harmless. Firearm specification was not attached to additional charges and plea may have been motivated by escaping life rape count that should have been dismissed.

Santini , Ohio App. It will not cure any violation of the statutory time frame for trial set forth in R. Westlake v. Cougill , 56 Ohio St. Kidd , 60 Ohio App. Johnson , 13 Ohio App. Cleveland v. Austin , 55 Ohio App. Also see Columbus v. McCreary , 3 Ohio App. McBreen , 54 Ohio St. McRae , 55 Ohio St. Davis , 44 Ohio App. Counsel may or may not have agreed orally, however no written waiver was executed. Continuance which was granted was said to be sua sponte. Held that time was not tolled as waiver was not in writing or in open court and reasons making the continuance reasonable were not set forth in a judgment entry filed before the expiration of the prescribed period.

Warf , 72 Ohio App. Wood , 81 Ohio App. Mintz , 74 Ohio App. This entailed entering a no contest plea, waiving his right to a speedy trial and agreeing to have finding entered at a later date. Court found entry of no contest plea alone did not amount to waiver of speedy trial rights and waiver of speedy trial was void when defendant was removed from program. Maisch , Ohio App.

Mock , Ohio App. Turner , Ohio App. Suggested that the proper remedy is a postconviction action asserting ineffective assistance of counsel.

McDonald , Ohio App. It then becomes the prosecutor's burden to demonstrate the extent to which time was tolled. Absent documentation that the defendant had other pending cases tolling triple count for days in custody, this burden was not met. State was untimely in responding to discovery request. Singer , 50 Ohio St. Geraldo , 13 Ohio App. Eberhardt , 56 Ohio App. Howard , 79 Ohio App. The state then bears the burden of demonstrating any tolling or extension of time under R.

Bowman , 41 Ohio App. See dissent for discussion of undue delay where whereabouts are known. Stamper , Ohio App. However, a date beyond that time was set, and the court failed to journalize a reason for continuance beyond the prescribed time before the seven days expired. Discharge ordered. Price , Ohio 65 -- Trial plainly started more than days after arrest.

When a motion to dismiss was made, the prosecutor said he thought they were within rule, but offered no evidence in this regard. The motion to dismiss should have been granted. The failure to meet the burden of proof may not be remedied by submitting on appeal evidence which should have been submitted to the trial court. Ladd , 56 Ohio St. W here the system is without fault, we will not enforce these rigorous time limitations when a narrowing construction or a finding of total inapplicability of the statute on the facts would better comport with presumed legislative purpose.

Messenger , 49 Ohio App. Also see Bryan v. Knapp , 21 Ohio St. Brown , 64 Ohio St. Blackburn , Ohio St. Homan , 89 Ohio St. Pilgrim , Ohio App. Masters , Ohio App. Initial waiver accompanying a continuance was open ended, but after the motion to dismiss was overruled enough additional time passed to take the case over the day limit.

The court is also of the view that the defendant was entitled to additional time between the cancelled trial date resulting from the initial continuance and waiver and the date the motion to dismiss was filed.

Azbell , Ohio St. Time did not begin to run until she was indicted and rearrested. Jovanovic , Ohio App. Looking to the actual entries, the court determines trial was timely. Bailey , Ohio App. Amberley v. Levine , Ohio Misc. Case was rescheduled outside the day speedy period applicable to speeding cases.

Case should have been dismissed. Steiner , 71 Ohio App. Lautenslager , Ohio App. Stone , 73 Ohio Ops. Justice , 49 Ohio App. Also see Westlake v. Stephens , 52 Ohio App. Adkins , 4 Ohio App. Haynes , 8 Ohio App.

McCornell , 91 Ohio App. Flowers June 21, , Franklin Co. Westerville v. Williams , 1 Ohio Ops. Kelly , 44 Ohio App. Parker , Ohio St. The defendant is entitled to triple count for the days between arrest and the day bond was posted on the misdemeanor.

Syllabus: " 1 When multiple charges arise from a criminal incident and share a common litigation history, pretrial incarceration on the multiple charges constitutes incarceration on the 'pending charges' for purposes of the triple-count provision of the speedy-trial statute, R. Dankworth , Ohio App. Green , Ross App. Burden of proof shifted to the prosecution to show he was not entitled to triple count because of a valid parole holder. Simply introducing an unauthenticated copy of the holder did not meet this burden.

Testimony or documentary evidence was required to show the holder was received by the Sheriff, the Sheriff acted on it, and that the holder remained in effect. MacDonald , 48 Ohio St. A person also being held on unrelated federal charges must be brought to trial within days. Fairbanks , 32 Ohio St. Hodges, v. Coller , 19 Ohio St. Kaise r , 56 Ohio St. Swanagin April 30, , Franklin Co.

Holton December 1, , Franklin Co. Baker , 92 Ohio App. However, it is incumbent upon defense counsel to make sure these records are preserved for appeal. Grinnell , Ohio App. Wolos , 8 Ohio App. Brownlow , 75 Ohio App. Collins , 91 Ohio App. Maxey September 29, , Franklin Co. Bond was continued on all charges. Consequently, the defendant remained in jail in lieu of bond on all charges.

Time continued to run, though it would not have if he had been sentenced. Wagner , 88 Ohio App. Held that time was not tolled for the period of the continuance. While the continuance may have been justified to allow new counsel to prepare the defense, this rationale was not carried into the court's entry, which must state the reasons for a continuance, if speedy trial time limit is to be tolled.

Though the judge offered an explanation after the fact, at page , the appellate court states that it is " Parsley , 82 Ohio App. Dunkins , 10 Ohio App. LeMaster December 20, , Franklin Co. Jones , 81 Ohio App. Sisco June 28, , Fairfield App. Hubbard , Ohio App. While the state must prove the existence of the holder, it need not prove its service upon the defendant. Phillips , 69 Ohio App. Thieshen , 55 Ohio App. Fielder , 66 Ohio Misc.

Question whether result would be different if defendant did not accept or sign for recognizance bond. Pierson , Ohio App. Record reflected reason for continuance, but entry only stated that it was at defense request. Time was tolled. Steinke , Ohio App. The court also finds it significant that counsel failed to object when he learned that after the continuance entry had been signed language was added stating that it was at the defendant's request.

Adkins , Ohio App. Benson , 29 Ohio App. A bailiff's testimony that continuances were charged to the defendant according to the court's internal scheduling card may not take the place of the requirement that the court speak through its journal.

Miller , 70 Ohio App. Orrill , 66 Ohio App. Terra , 74 Ohio App. It is not enough to note that the judge was in trial and that the case was continued until the first available date. Entry should have reflected whether court was involved in a civil or criminal trial.

Court's reasons should be stated at the time the continuance is ordered and not after the fact. Stamps , Ohio App. The court may look behind the journal entry to the transcript to determine whether a continuance was at the defendant's request.

Roquemore , 85 Ohio App. Ebright , 83 Ohio App. Mincy , 2 Ohio St. Cutcher , 56 Ohio St. Taylor , 51 Ohio App. Prisoner need not show he was actually prejudiced by failure to bring him to trial within the prescribed time. Wentworth , 54 Ohio St. Also see Elmwood Place v.

Denike , 56 Ohio St. Aurora v. Patrick , 61 Ohio St. Saffell , 35 Ohio St. Smith , 3 Ohio App. McKinney September 26, , Franklin Co. Hudson , 10 Ohio App. Rockwell , 80 Ohio App. Boston Heights v. Weikle , 81 Ohio App. Time was not tolled for the period leading up to a trial before a judge. Webb , Ohio App. Haar , 81 Ohio App. Reuschling , 30 Ohio App. Jones , Ohio App. Dismissal required as entry putting on continuance was inadequate.

Defendant police officer was charged with threatening to cut an year old's tongue out with his pocket knife. Bumbalough , 81 Ohio App. Wirtanen , Ohio App. Daugherty , Ohio App. Montgomery , 61 Ohio St. Lee , 48 Ohio St. Ferrante , 44 Ohio App. Prim , Ohio App. Court finds "unexplained refusal" and defendant's quote of a passage from the Bible as having "inspired" the homicide supported the court's referral for an evaluation.

Palmer , 84 Ohio St. North Olmstead v. Cipiti , Ohio App. Sentence upon conviction vacated though, as he had been in custody longer than he thirty day maximum sentence. Spratz , 58 Ohio St. Walker , 46 Ohio St. Ford , Ohio App. No reason was offered for the delay. In State v. Palmer , Ohio St. The Supreme Court found 30 days would have been reasonable and limited tolling accordingly.

Allowing 30 days to rule, or even 60, the case was over time. Bloate v. Time is extended to the extent it is needed for determination of a motion, or when the trial date is continued to allow preparation of motions. In this case it was not extended between the date the defendant sought additional time for preparation of pretrial motions and the date he waived his right to file such motions.

Tinkleberg , S. Sanchez , Ohio St. Sanchez , Ohio App. Brown , 98 Ohio St. Lakewood v. Papadelis , 32 Ohio St. New counsel's subsequent discovery motion did not toll time as there was nothing new to turn over. Updated witness list was provided only pursuant to the prosecutor's continuing duty to disclose.

Riley , Ohio App. Court finds a "reasonable time" to respond to a discovery request may extend to three months or longer. We often have clients that ask us whether they have the right to a speedy trial, and they most certainly do. The clock for a speedy trial begins on the date someone is arrested. There is no set number of days to determine whether the speedy trial right has been violated; however, if the delay is over 18 months, the claim is seriously considered by the court. If the delay is over 18 months, the fourth factor, prejudice, is presumed and the burden is on the prosecutor to rebut that presumption.

The Michigan Court of Appeals recently considered this issue in People v. In that case, the defendant was taken into custody on May 22, and his trial did not begin until two years later on June 5, In some cases this will happen right away. Each crime carries a range of time that may be served as punishment. The court will weigh the evidence, and may also hear from the defendant directly, to determine the length of the sentence.

Throughout the criminal process, it is important to have an attorney you trust working on your behalf. An experienced Michigan criminal defense attorney can make a major difference at each step along the way. Call us today for a free confidential consultation at Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail.

The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship. Practice Areas. Criminal Defense Information Center. Stages Of A Criminal Case. Stages Of A Criminal Case If you have been recently arrested or suspect that you may be arrested, you want to know what procedural steps the case against you will follow. Search Search.